|
Re: Jon Jacobs, Power Exchange, and Supe
Fri, 6 Jan, 1995
Laurel says:
>>> Unfortunately, most of my deepest emotional problems cannot be
articulated by me even out of subspace for several minutes. <<<
Um hum. I can relate--and how! Four or five years ago, it was very much
like that for me (provided you turn the "several minutes" into "several
hours to several days"--g). For me, part of the reason for this
inarticulateness was the unfamiliar intensity of the submissive
experience, especially during play (and I should probably stress the
word "unfamiliar," because while it hasn't lost its intenseness for me,
it's become a welcome, intimate friend). It threw me for a loop, just as
my other first experiences with altered consciousness threw me, because I
hadn't experienced it before. But slowly, as I got used to being this
high (or this deep--g), I learned that I could still think during it,
still do during it, still talk, without the high lessening. (Actually,
what happens, I think, is that I rise to the surface for a moment when I
think, do, or speak, but then bob right back down after the action is
completed). I've had to do this, because my darling master likes to be
"entertained" during play. (This is another subject, but people were
talking recently about the paradigms through which they see their
submission and masochism, like liege and servant. My main paradigm is
not visual: it's simple obedience, but my primary secondary paradigm [if
you get what I mean by that mouthful--g] is that of entertainment: I am
primarily put on this earth to entertain my owner, and I do my best in
that regard. What's interesting is that I suspect Donald also sees his
dominant role, after "He who must be obeyed," as that of an
entertainer, too. He works hard [although he would say it was hardly
working--g] at entertaining me! As you can probably imagine, it sometimes
gets pretty lively in Donald's and Rosie's house--g.)
The second reason for my inarticulateness (and I don't know if this
applies to you or not, but it might) was the nature of the emotional
problems that were coming up. They were extremely painful and not the
sort of thing my conscious mind wanted to deal with or articulate. And
often, the memories and experiences and feelings seem to come from a
point in my life when I was pre-verbal, so they were damned hard to
describe in words. But these emotional problems, as they were described
and explored (Donald refused to ignore them and go on with the play as if
nothing had happened), began to lessen in intensity and occurrence. This
happened very slowly over a period of years, to the point where I am now,
where I have maybe one really big incident a year. You know, I never did
fully understand or even fully remember what these bad feelings were
about (other than the fact that their source was probably in very early
childhood), but that didn't seem to be necessary to get freedom from
them. And quite frankly, this is one area where my curiousity does not
get the better of my more-rational impulses. As the problems seem to have
abetted and gotten better, I have no residual desire to know where they
really came from.
>>> I maintain really poorly under torture. :) Course, you've given me
reason to try now. :). <<<
Well, if you're the type who likes to challenge herself, you may find
this sort of thing an interesting experiment. I'm not the sort that
likes to challenge herself, especially while having sex, but then, I
"maintain" that I wasn't given much choice in the matter.
|
|